LAWYER SIBLING LOGO (1)
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • News
  • Updates
  • Constitution
    • Constitutional Laws
  • Laws
    • Civil Law
    • Criminal Law
    • Family Law
    • Real Estate Law
    • Business Law
    • Cyber & IT Law
    • Employee Law
    • Finance Law
    • International Law
  • Special Act
    • Motor Vehicles Act (MV Act)
    • Consumer Protection Act
    • Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Act (NDPS)
    • The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO)
  • Bare Act

Supreme Court directs Karnataka Government to factor in INTACH, IIT Roorkee reports for Mysuru heritage conservation

31/07/2026BlogNo Comments

The Supreme Court has directed the Karnataka Government to take into account the recommendations made by the Indian National Trust for Art and Cultural Heritage (INTACH) and the Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) Roorkee while carrying out restoration work on Mysuru’s historic Devaraja Market and Lansdowne Building.

A Bench comprising Justices J.B. Pardiwala and K. Vinod Chandran recorded the State Government’s submission that it had decided against demolishing the two heritage structures and would instead undertake their restoration. The Court was also informed that the State had initiated the process of inviting expressions of interest for the restoration project.

In view of the State’s decision, the Bench directed the authorities to examine the recommendations contained in the reports prepared by INTACH and IIT Roorkee and consider them during the execution of the conservation exercise.

The matter arises from a special leave petition challenging a Karnataka High Court order that had declined to interfere with the proposed demolition and reconstruction of the Devaraja Market and Lansdowne Building. The petitioner had argued that both structures possess significant historical and architectural value and should be preserved through scientific restoration rather than demolished.

During the proceedings, the Supreme Court had repeatedly emphasised the need to protect the heritage structures. It had earlier observed that the buildings qualify as heritage properties under the Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act, 1961, and that every effort should be made to conserve them if restoration was technically feasible.

Pursuant to the Court’s directions, INTACH conducted a structural assessment and concluded that both buildings could be restored without compromising their heritage character. The apex court subsequently sought an independent evaluation from IIT Roorkee, which broadly concurred with INTACH’s findings and recommended conservation through appropriate structural rehabilitation measures.

Earlier this year, the Court had relied on the IIT Roorkee report to underscore the importance of preserving the two structures and had directed the State to formulate a comprehensive restoration plan. Recording the Karnataka Government’s latest decision to proceed with conservation instead of demolition, the Court reiterated that the expert recommendations submitted by INTACH and IIT Roorkee should be duly considered while implementing the restoration project.

The post Supreme Court directs Karnataka Government to factor in INTACH, IIT Roorkee reports for Mysuru heritage conservation appeared first on India Legal.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • Isha Foundation defamation case: Delhi High Court orders removal of more videos, widens earlier takedown direction
  • Calcutta High Court refuses to accept electoral photo ID, Aadhaar as conclusive proof of citizenship
  • Karnataka High Court orders release of former Congress MLA Vinay Kulkarni in Yogesh Gowda murder case
  • Jantar Mantar protest: Noida Police register Zero FIR over derogatory remarks against PM Modi
  • Delhi government orders withdrawal of 13 FIRs against NEET-UG protesters without criminal antecedents

Recent Comments

  1. Phone Tracking In India - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  2. Section 437A of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  3. The Evolution of Indian Penal Code 1860: Key Provisions and Relevance Today - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA

Follow us for more

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
YouTube
Instagram
DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
All Rights Reserved © 2023
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Forgot Password?
Lost your password? Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.