LAWYER SIBLING LOGO (1)
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • News
  • Updates
  • Constitution
    • Constitutional Laws
  • Laws
    • Civil Law
    • Criminal Law
    • Family Law
    • Real Estate Law
    • Business Law
    • Cyber & IT Law
    • Employee Law
    • Finance Law
    • International Law
  • Special Act
    • Motor Vehicles Act (MV Act)
    • Consumer Protection Act
    • Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Act (NDPS)
    • The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO)
  • Bare Act

UP Government to challenge Allahabad High Court ruling quashing NSA detention of Noida protester before Supreme Court

09/09/2026BlogNo Comments

The Uttar Pradesh government will approach the Supreme Court against the Allahabad High Court judgment quashing the detention of Akriti Chaudhary, a Delhi University History graduate, under the National Security Act (NSA) and directing compensation for her wrongful detention.

Solicitor General Tushar Mehta informed a Bench comprising Chief Justice of India Surya Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi and Justice V Mohana that the State government would challenge the High Court ruling before the apex court. The Gautam Buddha Nagar District Magistrate, Medha Roopam, will also separately challenge the judgment.

On September 2, a Division Bench of Justice Atul Sreedharan and Justice Achal Sachdev of the Allahabad High Court had quashed Chaudhary’s NSA detention and directed the State to pay her Rs 5 lakh as compensation. The Court ordered that the amount be recovered from the salary of the District Magistrate and other officers responsible for preparing the report that ultimately led to her detention.

The High Court had strongly criticised the manner in which Chaudhary was detained, observing that the police report did not contain credible material to justify invoking the NSA. It held that the District Magistrate was expected to scrutinise the material carefully before resorting to what it described as the “oppressive provisions” of the law.

The Court had also made strong observations about the conduct of the District Magistrate, stating that it was “worthy of derision.”

Chaudhary was detained in connection with a protest by industrial workers in Noida in April. Although the High Court quashed her NSA detention after finding insufficient material to sustain it, she continues to remain in custody in connection with other criminal cases arising from the protest.

While allowing her habeas corpus petition, the High Court also issued wider observations on the constitutional duties of civil servants and police officers.

It reminded IAS and IPS officers that their allegiance is to the Constitution and not the political executive. The Court observed that whenever officials disregard their constitutional oath, they risk being perceived as an “oppressive vestige of the British Empire.”

The Bench further warned that failure by courts to check bureaucratic excesses could result in the State being reduced to an “Orwellian Dystopia.”

The dispute will now move to the Supreme Court, where the legality of the High Court’s findings and the directions for compensation and recovery from officials are likely to come under scrutiny.

The post UP Government to challenge Allahabad High Court ruling quashing NSA detention of Noida protester before Supreme Court appeared first on India Legal.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • Justice Mahesh Chandra Tripathi sworn in as Chief Justice of Bombay High Court
  • UP Government to challenge Allahabad High Court ruling quashing NSA detention of Noida protester before Supreme Court
  • I would prefer to die: Muzaffarnagar judge flags mafia threats while awarding death penalty
  • Justice RV Ghuge sworn in as Chief Justice of Calcutta High Court
  • APN News-Hansraj College launch future-ready AI media courses;provide industry and legal news exposure

Recent Comments

  1. Phone Tracking In India - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  2. Section 437A of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  3. The Evolution of Indian Penal Code 1860: Key Provisions and Relevance Today - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA

Follow us for more

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
YouTube
Instagram
DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
All Rights Reserved © 2023
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Forgot Password?
Lost your password? Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.