LAWYER SIBLING LOGO (1)
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • News
  • Updates
  • Constitution
    • Constitutional Laws
  • Laws
    • Civil Law
    • Criminal Law
    • Family Law
    • Real Estate Law
    • Business Law
    • Cyber & IT Law
    • Employee Law
    • Finance Law
    • International Law
  • Special Act
    • Motor Vehicles Act (MV Act)
    • Consumer Protection Act
    • Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Act (NDPS)
    • The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO)
  • Bare Act

Rs 370 biryani comment case: Pranit More moves Supreme Court to club FIRs, notice issued

21/09/2026BlogNo Comments

The Supreme Court on Monday sought responses from the Maharashtra and Haryana governments on stand-up comedian Pranit More’s plea seeking the clubbing of two FIRs registered against him over the Rs 370 biryani comment controversy.

A Bench comprising Chief Justice of India Surya Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi and Justice V Mohana issued notice on More’s plea seeking to club the FIR registered in Gurugram with an earlier FIR registered in Maharashtra.

Requesting a single consolidated proceeding, More counsel submitted that both FIRs originate from the same underlying incident.

The case relates to a viral video from one of More’s stand-up shows in Gurugram, where an audience member, Himanshu Jangra, spoke about spending Rs 370 on biryani during a date and suggested that he expected something in return from the woman.

The exchange, in which More participated as the host, drew widespread criticism after the video was circulated online.

The Maharashtra Cyber Police subsequently registered an FIR against More and others over the allegedly objectionable content, while the Gurugram Police later registered a separate FIR on a complaint by the National Commission for Women (NCW).

The NCW also summoned More and Jangra over the remarks concerning consent and sexual conduct.

More later publicly apologised for failing to object to the remarks during the show.

Informing the court that Pranit More has already apologized to the NCW and other bodies his lawyer affirmed that More acknowledges the situation’s gravity and is ready for trial. He stressed that More plea is only aimed at merging the separate FIRs.

Counsel further submitted that More had deleted the viral video after becoming aware of the seriousness of the controversy.

The Supreme Court, taking note of the submissions, issued notice to the concerned authorities on More’s plea seeking clubbing of the two FIRs.

The post Rs 370 biryani comment case: Pranit More moves Supreme Court to club FIRs, notice issued appeared first on India Legal.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • Ram Temple donation case: SIT to file first chargesheet by September 25
  • Delhi Court sets aside Magistrate order in Sonia Gandhi electoral roll case, remands FIR plea for fresh decision
  • NCLT, NCLAT are government’s lifeline: Supreme Court seeks urgent fixes to infrastructure, vacancies
  • No more selection committee: Delhi High Court gives full court final say on senior designations
  • Rs 370 biryani comment case: Pranit More moves Supreme Court to club FIRs, notice issued

Recent Comments

  1. Phone Tracking In India - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  2. Section 437A of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  3. The Evolution of Indian Penal Code 1860: Key Provisions and Relevance Today - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA

Follow us for more

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
YouTube
Instagram
DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
All Rights Reserved © 2023
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Forgot Password?
Lost your password? Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.