LAWYER SIBLING LOGO (1)
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • News
  • Updates
  • Constitution
    • Constitutional Laws
  • Laws
    • Civil Law
    • Criminal Law
    • Family Law
    • Real Estate Law
    • Business Law
    • Cyber & IT Law
    • Employee Law
    • Finance Law
    • International Law
  • Special Act
    • Motor Vehicles Act (MV Act)
    • Consumer Protection Act
    • Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Act (NDPS)
    • The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO)
  • Bare Act

Bombay High Court lists Imran Khan’s challenge to FRRO’s exit directive For October 26

19/10/2026BlogNo Comments

The Bombay High Court will take up actor Imran Khan’s challenge to a directive requiring him to leave India on October 26, after the actor questioned the legality of the order issued by the Foreigners Regional Registration Office (FRRO). The notice requires him to depart from the country by October 28.

A Division Bench of Chief Justice Mahesh Chandra Tripathi and Justice Advait Sethna fixed the hearing on Monday after senior advocate Venkatesh Dhond mentioned the petition for urgent consideration.

During the proceedings, the Bench asked whether Khan had any criminal antecedents. Dhond submitted that there were none and urged the Court to intervene against the departure directive. The judges also asked the actor to implead the Maharashtra government in the case so that the State could assist the Court on the issue.

Khan, a United States citizen and Overseas Citizen of India (OCI) cardholder, has challenged the FRRO’s October 14 notice, which directs him to leave India by October 28. The order followed his detention by Mumbai Police on October 10 in connection with a protest at August Kranti Maidan against Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar over the Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls.

The episode drew the attention of BJP leader Kirit Somaiya, who approached the police seeking action against the actor on the ground that he was a foreign national participating in the demonstration. The matter was subsequently referred to the FRRO, which issued the notice citing alleged violations of the Immigration and Foreigners Act, 2025.

In his petition, Khan has argued that the authorities issued the directive without first giving him an opportunity to explain his position. He has contended that the decision was taken in undue haste and disregarded the safeguards available to him under the law governing OCI cardholders.

The actor has also denied participating in the protest, stating that he was detained while standing near the venue. His plea questions the basis on which his presence in the vicinity of the demonstration was treated as grounds for directing him to leave the country.

Khan has asked the High Court to set aside the FRRO order and suspend its operation while the case is pending. He has also sought protection against coercive action arising from the notice.

The petition comes amid a separate proceeding initiated by the FRRO concerning Khan’s OCI registration. The authorities have issued a show-cause notice seeking an explanation as to why his OCI status should not be cancelled. That notice is not under challenge in the present petition.

With the departure deadline falling on October 28, the October 26 hearing is expected to address the actor’s request for urgent interim protection as well as his challenge to the legality of the FRRO directive.

The post Bombay High Court lists Imran Khan’s challenge to FRRO’s exit directive For October 26 appeared first on India Legal.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • AISA President Neha Bora moves Delhi High Court challenging police notice to execute peace bond
  • Kerala High Court says Supreme Court’s deadline for temple registration under captive elephant rules cannot be extended
  • Bombay High Court lists Imran Khan’s challenge to FRRO’s exit directive For October 26
  • Delhi High Court says voter’s fear of false declaration over Form 6 during SIR is misplaced
  • Supreme Court AOR seeks AG’s consent for criminal contempt action against Kerala Congress Chief over post asking CJI to resign

Recent Comments

  1. Phone Tracking In India - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  2. Section 437A of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  3. The Evolution of Indian Penal Code 1860: Key Provisions and Relevance Today - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA

Follow us for more

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
YouTube
Instagram
DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
All Rights Reserved © 2023
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Forgot Password?
Lost your password? Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.