LAWYER SIBLING LOGO (1)
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • News
  • Updates
  • Constitution
    • Constitutional Laws
  • Laws
    • Civil Law
    • Criminal Law
    • Family Law
    • Real Estate Law
    • Business Law
    • Cyber & IT Law
    • Employee Law
    • Finance Law
    • International Law
  • Special Act
    • Motor Vehicles Act (MV Act)
    • Consumer Protection Act
    • Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Act (NDPS)
    • The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO)
  • Bare Act

Aircel-Maxis deal: Delhi High Court stays proceedings against P Chidambaram in money laundering case

20/11/2024BlogNo Comments

The Delhi High Court on Wednesday stayed proceedings against Congress leader and former Union Minister P Chidambaram in a money laundering case related to the Aircel-Maxis deal of 2006.

While issuing notice to the Enforcement Directorate (ED), the single-judge Bench of Justice Manoj Kumar Ohri stayed the proceedings against Chidambaram till the next date of hearing.

The Congress leader had approached the High Court against the trial court order that took cognisance of a charge sheet filed by ED against the former Union Minister and his son Karti Chidambaram in the Aircel-Maxis case.

Appearing for Chidambaram, Senior Advocate N Hariharan argued that the cognisance could not have been taken without prosecution sanction.

Senior Advocate Hariharan was assisted by Advocates Arshdeep Singh and Akshat Gupta. Advocate Zoheb Hossain appeared for the national agency.

On November 27, 2021, the trial court had taken cognisance of the charge sheets filed by the CBI and the ED against P Chidambaram and his Karti Chidambaram in the case.

The trial court had said that there was “sufficient evidence” to summon Chidambarams and other accused persons in the corruption and money-laundering cases.

The matter was related to the alleged irregularities in the Foreign Investment Promotion Board (FIPB) approvals granted for the foreign investment made by Malaysia-based Maxis in Tamil Nadu-based network company Aircel, during the tenure of P Chidambaram as Union Finance Minister.

As per the prosecution, both Chidambaram and his son Karti had received kickbacks to ensure FIPB clearance for the Rs 3,500 crore deal between Aircel and Maxis.

Both the CBI and Enforcement Directorate had registered cases in connection with the transaction under the Prevention of Corruption (PC) Act and the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), respectively.

The ED filed the complaint on June 13, 2018, while CBI filed its charge sheet in the case in July 2018.

Both the CBI and the ED had filed their respective charge sheets and complaints in the case in July 2018.

The post Aircel-Maxis deal: Delhi High Court stays proceedings against P Chidambaram in money laundering case appeared first on India Legal.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • Nashik Court closes defamation case against Rahul Gandhi over remarks on Vinayak Damodar Savarkar
  • Supreme Court criticises petition challenging War Memorial, stresses respect for fallen soldiers
  • Travel insurance for rail passengers should not be limited to Online ticket bookings: Supreme Court
  • Supreme Court permits Passive Euthanasia for man in vegetative state since 2013
  • Supreme Court directs Centre to formulate no-fault compensation policy for serious COVID-19 vaccine adverse events

Recent Comments

  1. Phone Tracking In India - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  2. Section 437A of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  3. The Evolution of Indian Penal Code 1860: Key Provisions and Relevance Today - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA

Follow us for more

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
YouTube
Instagram
DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
All Rights Reserved © 2023
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Forgot Password?
Lost your password? Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.