LAWYER SIBLING LOGO (1)
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • News
  • Updates
  • Constitution
    • Constitutional Laws
  • Laws
    • Civil Law
    • Criminal Law
    • Family Law
    • Real Estate Law
    • Business Law
    • Cyber & IT Law
    • Employee Law
    • Finance Law
    • International Law
  • Special Act
    • Motor Vehicles Act (MV Act)
    • Consumer Protection Act
    • Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Act (NDPS)
    • The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO)
  • Bare Act

Bar councils must earn members respect, not merely exercise regulatory power: Justice BV Nagarathna

29/08/2026BlogNo Comments

Supreme Court Justice BV Nagarathna has stressed the need for Bar Councils to reflect upon their functioning, observing that it is a matter of concern when a regulatory body fails to command the respect and confidence of the very members it is entrusted to represent.

Justice Nagarathna said the Bar Councils, at both the national and State levels, carry a significant institutional responsibility towards maintaining professional standards, ethical conduct and discipline within the legal profession. Their authority, she indicated, should be accompanied by credibility and the trust of the Bar.

The judge emphasised that an independent and professionally robust Bar constitutes an indispensable component of the justice delivery system. Lawyers do not merely discharge obligations towards individual clients; as Officers of the Court, they also bear a larger responsibility towards the administration of justice and the preservation of constitutional values.

Against the backdrop of mounting judicial pendency, procedural delays and the increasing cost of litigation, Justice Nagarathna underscored the need for the legal profession to engage in collective introspection and contribute constructively towards strengthening the justice system.

She also highlighted the importance of preserving the independence of the Bar. Such independence, she noted, is not intended as a professional privilege but serves a larger constitutional purpose by enabling advocates to discharge their duties fearlessly and independently, without being subjected to undue influence.

Justice Nagarathna’s observations also drew attention to the broader responsibilities accompanying the legal profession. Law, she suggested, cannot be viewed merely as a commercial vocation in which legal expertise is exchanged for remuneration. It is a profession founded upon public trust, ethical obligations and a commitment to justice.

Her remarks assume significance amid continuing discussions concerning the functioning and accountability of Bar Councils. The observations underscore that statutory authority alone cannot sustain the legitimacy of a professional regulatory institution. Its credibility must equally flow from transparent functioning, ethical governance, fairness and the confidence it inspires among members of the Bar.

Addressing young law graduates, Justice Nagarathna further emphasised the responsibilities that accompany their entry into the profession. As future members of the Bar, they would have obligations extending beyond individual litigation and would become participants in an institution that plays a central role in the functioning of constitutional democracy.

The underlying message was clear: a Bar Council can effectively discharge its regulatory mandate only when its authority is matched by professional integrity and institutional credibility. Earning the confidence of the Bar, therefore, is not ancillary to its functioning but fundamental to the legitimacy of the institution itself.

The post Bar councils must earn members respect, not merely exercise regulatory power: Justice BV Nagarathna appeared first on India Legal.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • Nandigram By-Poll: Supreme Court declines to intervene in Congress candidate Milan pradhan’s interim bail
  • Delhi High Court Justice Prateek Jalan recuses from hearing Delhi Gymkhana Club eviction plea
  • Delhi High Court asks authorities to decide within six months on SOP for police body-worn cameras
  • Supreme Court: High Court should not suggest custodial interrogation is necessary while deciding anticipatory bail
  • Delhi High Court seeks clarity on legal framework for structural audits after Satya Niketan building collapse

Recent Comments

  1. Phone Tracking In India - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  2. Section 437A of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  3. The Evolution of Indian Penal Code 1860: Key Provisions and Relevance Today - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA

Follow us for more

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
YouTube
Instagram
DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
All Rights Reserved © 2023
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Forgot Password?
Lost your password? Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.