LAWYER SIBLING LOGO (1)
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • News
  • Updates
  • Constitution
    • Constitutional Laws
  • Laws
    • Civil Law
    • Criminal Law
    • Family Law
    • Real Estate Law
    • Business Law
    • Cyber & IT Law
    • Employee Law
    • Finance Law
    • International Law
  • Special Act
    • Motor Vehicles Act (MV Act)
    • Consumer Protection Act
    • Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Act (NDPS)
    • The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO)
  • Bare Act

Chorebagan Stampede: Calcutta High Court declines to monitor probe, allows State to appoint retired judge

21/10/2026BlogNo Comments

The Calcutta High Court has declined to directly supervise the investigation into the deadly Chorebagan Durga Puja pandal stampede in Kolkata, while permitting the West Bengal government to appoint a retired High Court judge of its choice to head a commission of inquiry into the tragedy.

A Division Bench headed by Chief Justice Ravindra V Ghuge observed that a sitting judge could not be assigned to head the proposed inquiry in view of the applicable Supreme Court guidelines. The Bench indicated that the State government could instead select a retired judge to lead the investigation into the circumstances surrounding the incident and identify those responsible.

The October 17 stampede at the Chorebagan Sarbojanin Durgostav Samity pandal in north Kolkata claimed 19 lives and left several others injured. The tragedy occurred during the Durga Puja celebrations, prompting demands for an independent and time-bound investigation into the circumstances that led to the loss of lives.

The High Court was hearing a public interest litigation filed by a lawyer seeking an independent and expeditious probe into the incident. The proceedings also took note of the State government’s request for a sitting judge to head the proposed inquiry.

The State had approached the Chief Justice seeking the appointment of a sitting judge to oversee the investigation, with the objective of ensuring an impartial examination of the incident. However, the Bench clarified that a sitting judge could not be assigned the responsibility in light of the Supreme Court’s guidelines and the constraints affecting the availability of judges.

The Court accordingly indicated that the government could constitute a commission headed by a retired judge of the High Court. The proposed inquiry is expected to examine the circumstances leading to the stampede, the adequacy of safety arrangements at the pandal and the role of individuals or authorities whose lapses may have contributed to the tragedy.

The decision followed Chief Minister Suvendu Adhikari’s announcement that the government would seek judicial involvement in the investigation. Following the Court’s direction, the Chief Minister indicated that the State would proceed with an inquiry committee headed by a retired judge and make its findings public after receiving the report.

The stampede has raised serious questions concerning crowd management and the safety arrangements at the venue. Reports have pointed to congestion at the exit, adverse weather conditions and possible shortcomings in the arrangements made to manage the gathering.

Police have arrested seven people, including two members of the puja organising committee, in connection with the incident. The accused have been booked under provisions relating to culpable homicide not amounting to murder and attempted culpable homicide. Investigators are also examining CCTV footage to reconstruct the sequence of events and determine potential responsibility.

The High Court declined to assume direct monitoring of the inquiry at this stage, leaving the State government to appoint a retired judge to head the commission. The investigation is expected to establish the causes of the stampede and examine whether negligence or failures in crowd-control arrangements contributed to the deaths.

The post Chorebagan Stampede: Calcutta High Court declines to monitor probe, allows State to appoint retired judge appeared first on India Legal.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • Delhi High Court allows CJP leaders to withdraw challenge to Judicial custody, leaves merits open
  • Why invoke High Court jurisdiction when lower court is seized of matter: Delhi High Court questions CJP leaders plea against custody extension
  • Supreme Court stays CMRL case probe against Pinarayi Vijayan for seven days, asks Kerala High Court to hear appeal
  • Allahabad High Court seeks Centre, RBI response on access to bank deposits of comatose patients by dependants
  • Supreme Court asks Andhra Pradesh State Election Commission to consider YSRCP plea for extension of nomination deadline

Recent Comments

  1. Phone Tracking In India - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  2. Section 437A of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  3. The Evolution of Indian Penal Code 1860: Key Provisions and Relevance Today - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA

Follow us for more

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
YouTube
Instagram
DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
All Rights Reserved © 2023
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Forgot Password?
Lost your password? Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.