LAWYER SIBLING LOGO (1)
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • News
  • Updates
  • Constitution
    • Constitutional Laws
  • Laws
    • Civil Law
    • Criminal Law
    • Family Law
    • Real Estate Law
    • Business Law
    • Cyber & IT Law
    • Employee Law
    • Finance Law
    • International Law
  • Special Act
    • Motor Vehicles Act (MV Act)
    • Consumer Protection Act
    • Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Act (NDPS)
    • The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO)
  • Bare Act

Delhi court sends hotel owner to four-day police custody in Malviya Nagar fire case

05/06/2026BlogNo Comments

A Delhi court has remanded hotel owner Lavkesh Bajaj to four days’ police custody in connection with a devastating fire, which broke out in a hotel at Delhi’s Malviya Nagar area on June 3, claiming 21 lives and leaving several injured.

Judicial Magistrate First Class Bhanu Pratap Singh at the Saket Courts on Thursday allowed the Delhi Police’s application seeking custodial interrogation of the accused, orally observing that the arrest appeared lawful.

A massive fire broke out at the Flourish Stay B&B located in the Hauz Rani area of Malviya Nagar on June 3, resulting in the death of 21 persons, including nationals from African countries and Turkmenistan. According to official records, at least 58 people were rescued from the premises and shifted to hospitals for treatment.

The counsel appearing for the Delhi Police apprised the court that several members of the hotel staff were yet to be examined and that the accused had disclosed only two names during the course of investigation. It was further submitted that custodial interrogation was necessary to ascertain the full extent of the alleged violations and identify other persons involved in the operation and management of the establishment.

The counsel appearing for Bajaj opposed the application and contended that the arrest was illegal. It was argued that neither a copy of the First Information Report nor the grounds of arrest had been supplied to the accused, thereby violating procedural safeguards guaranteed under criminal law.

Bajaj was arrested shortly after the incident. Before his arrest, the Delhi Police had issued a Look Out Circular (LOC) against him and his wife to trace their whereabouts following the fire. An FIR has been registered against the hotel owner under Sections 105 and 326 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023, relating to culpable homicide not amounting to murder and mischief by fire or explosive substance causing damage, respectively.

Preliminary findings indicate that the hotel was allegedly operating without a valid fire no-objection certificate (NOC) and was situated in a congested lane with limited access. Authorities have further alleged that although the building had approval for only six rooms, it was being operated with more than 20 rooms and had a single entry-exit point, raising serious concerns regarding compliance with fire safety norms and municipal regulations.

Police said they are conducting the probe from all angles, including to determine whether statutory violations, regulatory lapses and acts of negligence contributed to the tragedy. The agency is also examining the role of other individuals associated with the establishment and the circumstances under which the hotel was allegedly operating beyond its sanctioned capacity.

The post Delhi court sends hotel owner to four-day police custody in Malviya Nagar fire case appeared first on India Legal.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • Delhi High Court declines urgent hearing on plea seeking restrictions on Cockroach Janta Party protest
  • Supreme Court issues contempt notice to AIIMS Acting Director over non-compliance with affidavit direction in DNA test case
  • Delhi riots 2020: High Court removes stay on trial court proceedings in UAPA case
  • First-ever: Four women simultaneously serve as High Court Chief Justices in India
  • Madras High Court declares Appavu winner of 2016 Radhapuram election after 10 years, questions Supreme Court over delay in deciding recount dispute

Recent Comments

  1. Phone Tracking In India - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  2. Section 437A of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  3. The Evolution of Indian Penal Code 1860: Key Provisions and Relevance Today - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA

Follow us for more

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
YouTube
Instagram
DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
All Rights Reserved © 2023
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Forgot Password?
Lost your password? Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.