LAWYER SIBLING LOGO (1)
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • News
  • Updates
  • Constitution
    • Constitutional Laws
  • Laws
    • Civil Law
    • Criminal Law
    • Family Law
    • Real Estate Law
    • Business Law
    • Cyber & IT Law
    • Employee Law
    • Finance Law
    • International Law
  • Special Act
    • Motor Vehicles Act (MV Act)
    • Consumer Protection Act
    • Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Act (NDPS)
    • The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO)
  • Bare Act

Delhi High Court exempts NCR-based lawyers, court staff from non-BS-VI vehicle ban on court working days

06/11/2026BlogNo Comments

The Delhi High Court has granted relief to advocates and judicial staff residing in the National Capital Region (NCR), permitting them to enter the national capital in vehicles registered outside Delhi that do not comply with BS-VI emission standards. The exemption, however, will remain restricted to court working days.

Justice Amit Mahajan passed the order on November 6 while hearing a petition filed by the Delhi High Court Bar Association (DHCBA), which had challenged the restrictions imposed on the movement of non-BS-VI compliant vehicles registered outside Delhi.

A detailed order is awaited.

The Association had approached the High Court seeking an exemption for advocates residing in NCR cities, including Gurugram, Faridabad, Noida and Ghaziabad, who regularly travel to Delhi for professional engagements.

Senior Advocate N. Hariharan, who is also the DHCBA President, appeared for the Association and submitted that lawyers and court staff discharge essential functions connected with the administration of justice. He argued that preventing them from entering Delhi could adversely affect court proceedings and the functioning of the judicial system.

Referring to the exemption mechanism available under the government’s notification, Hariharan submitted that the authorities possessed the power to grant relaxation to specific categories of vehicles. He also pointed out that lawyers had received similar concessions during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Emphasising the importance of lawyers’ physical presence in court, he argued that restrictions preventing advocates from reaching the courts would have consequences for the justice delivery mechanism.

The DHCBA had sought permission for advocates travelling to Delhi for professional purposes during the period between November 1, 2026 and January 31, 2027.

The Association contended that a substantial number of lawyers practising in Delhi reside in neighbouring NCR cities and depend on their personal vehicles to attend court hearings, meet clients and senior advocates, and access their chambers.

It further submitted that restrictions on their movement could interfere with their ability to appear in matters listed before courts at designated times, potentially causing prejudice to litigants.

The dispute arises from a June 23, 2026 notification issued by the Delhi Government’s Department of Environment and Forests, prohibiting vehicles registered outside Delhi and not meeting BS-VI emission standards from entering the national capital between November 1 and January 31 as part of measures to tackle winter air pollution.

The notification also empowers the Environment Department to grant exemptions to additional categories of vehicles.

The DHCBA relied on this provision to seek a regulated relaxation for advocates required to travel to Delhi for their professional responsibilities.

The petition was filed through advocate Amit Choudhary.

The High Court’s order provides a limited exemption to NCR-based lawyers and court staff without suspending the underlying restrictions on non-BS-VI vehicles.

The detailed order is expected to clarify the modalities governing the exemption.

The post Delhi High Court exempts NCR-based lawyers, court staff from non-BS-VI vehicle ban on court working days appeared first on India Legal.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • Constitution is a continuing responsibility, says CJI Surya Kant at Ambedkar Conference
  • Delhi High Court exempts NCR-based lawyers, court staff from non-BS-VI vehicle ban on court working days
  • Supreme Court calls for people’s movement against firecracker pollution, says judicial orders alone cannot ensure compliance
  • Delhi court dismisses complaint seeking FIR against CM Rekha Gupta over Lord Hanuman remarks
  • Supreme Court declines to suspend Tarun Tejpal’s 10-year sentence in 2013 rape case

Recent Comments

  1. Phone Tracking In India - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  2. Section 437A of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  3. The Evolution of Indian Penal Code 1860: Key Provisions and Relevance Today - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA

Follow us for more

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
YouTube
Instagram
DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
All Rights Reserved © 2023
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Forgot Password?
Lost your password? Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.