LAWYER SIBLING LOGO (1)
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • News
  • Updates
  • Constitution
    • Constitutional Laws
  • Laws
    • Civil Law
    • Criminal Law
    • Family Law
    • Real Estate Law
    • Business Law
    • Cyber & IT Law
    • Employee Law
    • Finance Law
    • International Law
  • Special Act
    • Motor Vehicles Act (MV Act)
    • Consumer Protection Act
    • Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Act (NDPS)
    • The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO)
  • Bare Act

Judicial review must not turn into judicial overreach: Former CJI BR Gavai

09/05/2026BlogNo Comments

Former Chief Justice of India (CJI) BR Gavai on Saturday said that judicial review must not turn into judicial overreach, while stressing that all organs of the State must function within the constitutional limits assigned to them.

Speaking at the 19th Sujata Jayawardena Memorial Oration organised by the University of Colombo, Justice Gavai underlined the judiciary’s role as a constitutional watchdog responsible for ensuring that legislative and executive actions remain within constitutional boundaries. At the same time, he cautioned that courts must remain conscious of their own institutional limitations.

The former CJI said that a constitutional democracy could not function through one centre of unchecked power and observed that authority in such a system was distributed among different institutions and limited by the Constitution.

He said the Indian constitutional framework did not grant absolute supremacy to Parliament, the executive or the judiciary. According to him, all institutions derived their authority from the Constitution and were bound by its limitations.

Justice Gavai stated that Parliament was not supreme in India in any absolute sense and emphasised that the Constitution alone occupied the highest position within the constitutional framework.

Referring to debates in the Constituent Assembly and the views of BR Ambedkar, Justice Gavai said each organ of the State functioned within its own constitutional domain and could exercise authority only to the extent permitted by the Constitution.

Justice Gavai also discussed the relationship between Parliament and the judiciary, observing that the interaction between the two institutions was not always adversarial. He noted that judicial decisions at times identified constitutional gaps, following which Parliament responded by incorporating those principles into legislation through the democratic process.

According to him, India’s constitutional experience demonstrated that parliamentary authority was balanced by constitutional limitations and institutional checks. He added that Sri Lanka appeared to reflect a similar constitutional trajectory.

The former CJI said that friction among the legislature, executive and judiciary was inevitable in a constitutional democracy and played an important role in shaping and preserving constitutional values. However, he stressed that each institution must continue to operate within the framework laid down by the Constitution.

Reiterating the judiciary’s constitutional responsibility, Justice Gavai said the courts must ensure that the exercise of power by the legislature and executive remained within constitutional limits. At the same time, he warned that judicial activism should not cross into judicial adventurism and emphasised the importance of maintaining institutional balance within a constitutional democracy.

The post Judicial review must not turn into judicial overreach: Former CJI BR Gavai appeared first on India Legal.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • Supreme Court Collegium recommends appointment of Justice Meenakshi M Rai as Chief Justice of Patna High Court
  • Centre orders Delhi Gymkhana to hand over club land for public purpose
  • When Liberty Waits Too Long
  • The Illusion of Final Victory
  • Reframing Evidence Law in Talari Naresh Verdict

Recent Comments

  1. Phone Tracking In India - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  2. Section 437A of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  3. The Evolution of Indian Penal Code 1860: Key Provisions and Relevance Today - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA

Follow us for more

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
YouTube
Instagram
DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
All Rights Reserved © 2023
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Forgot Password?
Lost your password? Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.