LAWYER SIBLING LOGO (1)
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • News
  • Updates
  • Constitution
    • Constitutional Laws
  • Laws
    • Civil Law
    • Criminal Law
    • Family Law
    • Real Estate Law
    • Business Law
    • Cyber & IT Law
    • Employee Law
    • Finance Law
    • International Law
  • Special Act
    • Motor Vehicles Act (MV Act)
    • Consumer Protection Act
    • Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Act (NDPS)
    • The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO)
  • Bare Act

Madras High Court calls for dedicated special courts across Tamil Nadu to expedite corruption trials

12/11/2026BlogNo Comments

The Court noted that 2,423 cases under the Prevention of Corruption Act were pending across the State as of June 30, 2026.

The Madras High Court has called upon the Tamil Nadu Government to consider setting up additional exclusive Special Courts for corruption cases, observing that the substantial pendency of such matters requires dedicated judicial infrastructure rather than being treated as an additional burden on regular trial courts.

Justice B. Pugalendhi issued the directions while dealing with a petition seeking expeditious disposal of a corruption case pending before the Principal District and Sessions Court in Thoothukudi. The Court took note of official figures showing that 2,423 cases under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, were pending across Tamil Nadu as on June 30, 2026.

The Court pointed out that exclusive Special Courts were operational in only eight districts, whereas corruption cases in the remaining 30 districts were being dealt with by Principal District and Sessions Judges in addition to their regular judicial assignments.

Emphasising the statutory framework governing corruption trials, the Court referred to Section 4(4) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, which envisages day-to-day hearings, as far as practicable, and an endeavour to conclude trials within two years. It observed that such a legislative mandate could not be effectively implemented merely by asking courts to accelerate proceedings without providing them with adequate infrastructure, judicial time and supporting personnel.

The High Court observed that the volume of pending corruption cases could not reasonably be treated as routine judicial workload to be accommodated alongside the other responsibilities of Principal District and Sessions Judges. It underscored that the objective of expeditious trials would be undermined if courts were unable to devote sufficient attention to these matters because of their existing judicial and administrative commitments.

Accordingly, the Court directed the Registrar General to pursue the proposal for designating Additional Sessions Courts as Special Courts under the Act. It also asked the State Government, in consultation with the High Court, to assess the requirement for establishing exclusive Special Courts in districts where such institutions are presently unavailable.

The State was further directed to ensure the availability of requisite infrastructure and supporting staff, while the Directorate of Vigilance and Anti-Corruption was asked to provide adequate prosecuting personnel. The trial courts handling corruption matters were also directed to accord priority to these cases and make efforts to conduct hearings on a day-to-day basis.

With regard to the case before it, the High Court noted that although charges had been framed in 2023, only two witnesses had been examined thereafter. It consequently directed the Thoothukudi trial court to make every endeavour to complete the proceedings within six months, avoiding unnecessary adjournments, subject to the cooperation of the parties.

The post Madras High Court calls for dedicated special courts across Tamil Nadu to expedite corruption trials appeared first on India Legal.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • Victim’s desire to continue living with accused no ground to quash POCSO case: Delhi High Court
  • Former Madras High Court judge Justice CS Karnan dies at 71; was first sitting HC judge to be jailed for contempt
  • Criminalising peaceful protests would be a sad day for democracy: Bombay High Court
  • Name the judges who are with BJP: Calcutta High Court questions Abhishek Banerjee over remarks against Judiciary
  • Centre to introduce evening courts in Delhi, Bihar and Andhra Pradesh on pilot basis to reduce case backlog

Recent Comments

  1. Phone Tracking In India - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  2. Section 437A of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  3. The Evolution of Indian Penal Code 1860: Key Provisions and Relevance Today - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA

Follow us for more

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
YouTube
Instagram
DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
All Rights Reserved © 2023
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Forgot Password?
Lost your password? Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.