LAWYER SIBLING LOGO (1)
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • News
  • Updates
  • Constitution
    • Constitutional Laws
  • Laws
    • Civil Law
    • Criminal Law
    • Family Law
    • Real Estate Law
    • Business Law
    • Cyber & IT Law
    • Employee Law
    • Finance Law
    • International Law
  • Special Act
    • Motor Vehicles Act (MV Act)
    • Consumer Protection Act
    • Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Act (NDPS)
    • The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO)
  • Bare Act

Madras High Court dismisses plea to restrict number of advocates accompanying VIPs in court

08/11/2024BlogNo Comments

The Madras High Court dismissed a plea to restrict the number of advocates accompanying VIPs/VVIPs in court.

The bench of Chief Justice K.R. Shriram and Justice Senthil Kumar Ramamoorthy dismissed the public interest litigation filed by advocate N. Mahendra Babu. 

The petition sought a directive to frame rules limiting the number of advocates accompanying VIPs/VVIPs in subordinate courts, citing inconvenience to other advocates and litigants.

The court held that in the absence of a public duty to impose restrictions, the petitioner was not entitled to a mandamus. 

Currently, there is no enactment regulating the number of advocates appearing for or accompanying parties to court.

The petitioner had submitted a representation to the High Court Registrar on July 17, 2023, which prompted the filing of this petition. 

The court dismissed the petition without costs.

The post Madras High Court dismisses plea to restrict number of advocates accompanying VIPs in court appeared first on India Legal.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • Supreme Court permits voting for West Bengal residents cleared shortly before poll day
  • Public perception of judicial independence tied to verdicts in big cases: Justice Rajesh Bindal
  • Supreme Court denies relief to Anil Ambani in bank fraud classification case
  • West Bengal elections: Supreme Court upholds ECI decision to transfer senior officers
  • Supreme Court rejects plea to penalise non-voters, upholds freedom of choice

Recent Comments

  1. Phone Tracking In India - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  2. Section 437A of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  3. The Evolution of Indian Penal Code 1860: Key Provisions and Relevance Today - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA

Follow us for more

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
YouTube
Instagram
DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
All Rights Reserved © 2023
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Forgot Password?
Lost your password? Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.