LAWYER SIBLING LOGO (1)
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • News
  • Updates
  • Constitution
    • Constitutional Laws
  • Laws
    • Civil Law
    • Criminal Law
    • Family Law
    • Real Estate Law
    • Business Law
    • Cyber & IT Law
    • Employee Law
    • Finance Law
    • International Law
  • Special Act
    • Motor Vehicles Act (MV Act)
    • Consumer Protection Act
    • Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Act (NDPS)
    • The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO)
  • Bare Act

Priyank Kharge moves Karnataka High Court to quash defamation case over alleged remarks against RSS

21/09/2026BlogNo Comments

Karnataka Home Minister Priyank Kharge has moved the Karnataka High Court seeking quashing of criminal defamation proceedings pending against him over alleged remarks concerning the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS).

Kharge has challenged the June 27, 2026 order passed by the Bengaluru Special Court dealing with criminal cases involving sitting and former MPs and MLAs, whereby the court took cognisance of an offence under Section 356 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) against Kharge and Congress leader Mohammed Haris Nalapad.

Through the petition, Kharge has sought setting aside of the cognisance order as well as all consequential proceedings arising from the private complaint filed against him. The matter is titled Sri Priyank M. Kharge v. Sri Tejas A. and is registered as Criminal Petition No. 13980 of 2026 before the High Court.

The complaint was instituted by RSS member A. Tejas, who alleged that Kharge had made defamatory statements against the RSS and its members through social media posts and other public statements in October 2025. Allegations were also raised against Nalapad in relation to statements concerning the organisation.

The Special Court, after considering the material placed before it, proceeded against Kharge and Nalapad but declined to continue the proceedings against former Karnataka Minister Dinesh Gundu Rao. The court found prima facie material warranting cognisance against Kharge and Nalapad under Section 356 BNS.

The proceedings subsequently continued before the trial court. On August 29, Kharge and Nalapad were granted bail after the court noted that the offence under Section 356 BNS is bailable. Both accused have disputed the allegations and sought to contest the proceedings.

On September 19, the Special Court further permitted Kharge and Nalapad to remain personally absent from the proceedings by granting them exemption under Section 317 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The complainant was granted a final opportunity to lead evidence, and the matter has been listed for October 7.

In his plea before the High Court, Kharge has sought termination of the proceedings, including the cognisance order. Among the grounds cited is the difficulty associated with his repeated personal appearance before the trial court, with the petition noting that he ordinarily resides in Kerala.

The High Court is now seized of Kharge’s challenge to the continuation of the criminal case. The filing, at this stage, raises a challenge to the cognisance and consequential proceedings and does not constitute any adjudication on whether the alleged statements are ultimately defamatory or whether they attract criminal liability.

The petition is before Justice Ananth Ramanath Hegde.

The post Priyank Kharge moves Karnataka High Court to quash defamation case over alleged remarks against RSS appeared first on India Legal.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • Seven new judges take oath in Delhi High Court, Bench strength rises to 50
  • Priyank Kharge moves Karnataka High Court to quash defamation case over alleged remarks against RSS
  • Delhi Riots UAPA case: Delhi High Court to hear Umar Khalid, Sharjeel Imam bail pleas on September 30
  • Mahua Moitra moves Calcutta High Court again after fresh egg-pelting attack
  • Supreme Court refuses to cancel bail of murder accused over money and power social media post

Recent Comments

  1. Phone Tracking In India - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  2. Section 437A of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  3. The Evolution of Indian Penal Code 1860: Key Provisions and Relevance Today - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA

Follow us for more

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
YouTube
Instagram
DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
All Rights Reserved © 2023
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Forgot Password?
Lost your password? Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.