LAWYER SIBLING LOGO (1)
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • News
  • Updates
  • Constitution
    • Constitutional Laws
  • Laws
    • Civil Law
    • Criminal Law
    • Family Law
    • Real Estate Law
    • Business Law
    • Cyber & IT Law
    • Employee Law
    • Finance Law
    • International Law
  • Special Act
    • Motor Vehicles Act (MV Act)
    • Consumer Protection Act
    • Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Act (NDPS)
    • The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO)
  • Bare Act

Retired Judges and Senior lawyers write to CJI, criticising remarks by Supreme Court on Rohingya refugees

06/12/2025BlogNo Comments

A group of retired judges and senior members of the legal fraternity has written a strong letter to Chief Justice of India Surya Kant, expressing concern over remarks allegedly made by a Supreme Court Bench during a recent hearing involving Rohingya refugees. The signatories, which include former High Court judges and prominent lawyers, said the comments risked “dehumanising” one of the world’s most persecuted communities.

The controversy stems from observations reportedly made during the hearing of a habeas corpus petition concerning missing Rohingya individuals. According to the letter, the Bench questioned whether Rohingyas could be considered “refugees” at all and appeared to equate them with illegal intruders. The signatories also objected to remarks that seemed to suggest that non-citizens might not be entitled to food, shelter, or education because India faces its own resource constraints.

In their letter, the retired judges and advocates argued that such views undermine constitutional protections that apply to “all persons,” irrespective of nationality. They reminded the CJI that Article 21 guarantees basic human dignity to every individual on Indian soil and that India has historically offered refuge to communities fleeing violence, even without formal refugee laws.

They further warned that comments made in open court carry significant influence, shaping how government officials and lower courts respond to vulnerable groups. Portraying refugees as threats, they said, risks normalising hostility and weakening the judiciary’s commitment to fairness and humanitarian principles.

Calling the remarks “deeply troubling,” the signatories urged the Chief Justice to reaffirm the Supreme Court’s role as protector of fundamental rights and to ensure that the discourse surrounding refugees does not stray from constitutional morality and established human rights norms

The post Retired Judges and Senior lawyers write to CJI, criticising remarks by Supreme Court on Rohingya refugees appeared first on India Legal.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • West Bengal voter roll revision: EC sets up 19 Tribunals for appeals under Supreme Court oversight
  • Newshounds on social media watch out! Govt proposes amendments to IT Rules that may impact them
  • West Bengal elections: Calcutta HC dismisses PIL challenging ECI transfer of bureaucrats, police officers
  • Vedanta approaches Supreme Court over Adani’s Jaiprakash Associates resolution plan
  • Andhra Pradesh High Court clarifies Property Rights in absence of children under Hindu Succession Act

Recent Comments

  1. Phone Tracking In India - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  2. Section 437A of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  3. The Evolution of Indian Penal Code 1860: Key Provisions and Relevance Today - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA

Follow us for more

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
YouTube
Instagram
DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
All Rights Reserved © 2023
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Forgot Password?
Lost your password? Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.