LAWYER SIBLING LOGO (1)
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • News
  • Updates
  • Constitution
    • Constitutional Laws
  • Laws
    • Civil Law
    • Criminal Law
    • Family Law
    • Real Estate Law
    • Business Law
    • Cyber & IT Law
    • Employee Law
    • Finance Law
    • International Law
  • Special Act
    • Motor Vehicles Act (MV Act)
    • Consumer Protection Act
    • Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Act (NDPS)
    • The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO)
  • Bare Act

Supreme Court agrees to hear Somnath Bharti’s challenge to Satish Upadhyay’s 2025 Delhi assembly election victory

17/07/2026BlogNo Comments

The Supreme Court admitted an appeal filed by Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) leader and former Delhi Minister Somnath Bharti challenging the election of Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) MLA Satish Upadhyay from the Malviya Nagar Assembly constituency in the 2025 Delhi Assembly elections.

A Bench comprising Justice Vikram Nath and Justice Sandeep Mehta granted leave to appeal after hearing Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal, appearing for Bharti, and Senior Advocate Maninder Singh, representing Upadhyay. By granting leave, the Court agreed to examine the legality of the Delhi High Court’s decision dismissing Bharti’s election petition.

Before the apex court, Bharti contended that the High Court had erred in rejecting his election petition on the ground that he had failed to implead Congress candidate Jitender Kumar Kochar as a necessary party. According to the appellant, the High Court adopted an unduly technical approach despite the substance of the allegations raised in the petition.

Bharti’s election petition had alleged corrupt electoral practices during the campaign, including claims that the successful BJP candidate had financially backed the Congress nominee with the objective of splitting votes and adversely affecting Bharti’s electoral prospects. However, Kochar was not arrayed as a respondent in the proceedings before the High Court.

On January 17, the Delhi High Court dismissed the election petition, holding that the failure to implead an allegedly corrupt candidate as a necessary party constituted a fatal defect under the Representation of the People Act, 1951, which could not be cured after the statutory limitation period.

With the Supreme Court now admitting the appeal, the challenge to Upadhyay’s election will be examined on merits. The proceedings will determine whether the High Court was justified in dismissing the election petition at the threshold on the ground of non-joinder of a necessary party.

The post Supreme Court agrees to hear Somnath Bharti’s challenge to Satish Upadhyay’s 2025 Delhi assembly election victory appeared first on India Legal.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • Centre moves Supreme Court against Delhi High Court verdict quashing overseas Passport and Visa services tender
  • Supreme Court asks Rajasthan to reassess Asaram Bapu’s health before deciding Interim bail plea
  • Supreme Court refuses to interfere in Rs 4.25 Crore decree against filmmaker Gautham Vasudev Menon
  • Kerala Government challenges High Court’s interim curbs on State Waqf Board before Supreme Court
  • Supreme Court seeks responses on SCBA plea for Nationwide institutional reforms to support women advocates

Recent Comments

  1. Phone Tracking In India - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  2. Section 437A of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  3. The Evolution of Indian Penal Code 1860: Key Provisions and Relevance Today - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA

Follow us for more

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
YouTube
Instagram
DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
All Rights Reserved © 2023
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Forgot Password?
Lost your password? Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.