LAWYER SIBLING LOGO (1)
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • News
  • Updates
  • Constitution
    • Constitutional Laws
  • Laws
    • Civil Law
    • Criminal Law
    • Family Law
    • Real Estate Law
    • Business Law
    • Cyber & IT Law
    • Employee Law
    • Finance Law
    • International Law
  • Special Act
    • Motor Vehicles Act (MV Act)
    • Consumer Protection Act
    • Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Act (NDPS)
    • The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO)
  • Bare Act

Supreme Court grants Election Commission of India four months to adjudicate TMC name and symbol dispute

28/09/2026BlogNo Comments

The Supreme Court on Monday directed the Election Commission of India (ECI) to bring to finality, within four months, the dispute between rival factions of the All India Trinamool Congress (AITC) concerning the party’s name and its reserved ‘Flowers & Grass’ election symbol.

A Bench comprising Chief Justice of India Surya Kant and Justices Joymalya Bagchi and V. Mohana prescribed a four-week period for the rival claimants to complete their pleadings by way of affidavits and counter-affidavits. The Election Commission is thereafter required to conclude the adjudicatory process within three months under Paragraph 15 of the Election Symbols (Reservation and Allotment) Order, 1968.

The directions were issued in a writ petition instituted by AITC founder Mamata Banerjee assailing the ECI’s September 17 interim order, whereby the Commission had frozen the use of the party’s original name and symbol pending determination of competing claims to the political identity and organisational control of the party.

Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal, appearing for Banerjee, had clarified that the petitioner was not seeking any intervention in the ongoing by-elections, but was pressing for an expeditious adjudication of the substantive dispute. The Court’s approach was accordingly directed towards securing an early final determination without disturbing the electoral process already underway.

Senior Advocate Dama Seshadri Naidu, appearing for the ECI, submitted that proceedings of this nature necessarily involve consideration of voluminous material, including affidavits from a large body of party functionaries and workers, and therefore require adequate time. During the hearing, Justice Bagchi also indicated that technological tools, including artificial intelligence, could potentially be deployed to facilitate the handling of the extensive material placed before the Commission.

The controversy stems from rival claims over the AITC’s established political identity. On September 17, the ECI, faced with competing claims to the party’s name and election symbol in the run-up to the October 6 by-elections, put in place an interim arrangement restraining both factions from using the original AITC name and the ‘Flowers & Grass’ symbol until the dispute is finally determined under Paragraph 15.

As part of that interim arrangement, the Commission allotted the name “Mamata All India Trinamool Congress” and the ‘Football Player’ symbol to the faction led by Mamata Banerjee, while the rival group was assigned the name “Democratic Trinamool Congress” and the ‘Envelope’ symbol. The arrangement was made applicable to the ensuing by-elections, including contests at Nandigram and Rejinagar.

The Supreme Court’s latest directions are confined to ensuring a time-bound adjudication of the substantive dispute over entitlement to the AITC name and the ‘Flowers & Grass’ symbol under Paragraph 15. The interim electoral arrangement, therefore, remains distinct from the final de

The post Supreme Court grants Election Commission of India four months to adjudicate TMC name and symbol dispute appeared first on India Legal.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • Delhi High Court: Muslim personal law cannot shield sexual intercourse with wife below 18 from POCSO
  • Sohrabuddin encounter case: Supreme Court issues notice on plea challenging 22 acquittals
  • Supreme Court grants Election Commission of India four months to adjudicate TMC name and symbol dispute
  • Supreme Court dismisses PIL seeking probe into alleged offshore fund routing, Adani transactions
  • Supreme Court reserves judgment on front-of-pack warning labels for packaged foods

Recent Comments

  1. Phone Tracking In India - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  2. Section 437A of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  3. The Evolution of Indian Penal Code 1860: Key Provisions and Relevance Today - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA

Follow us for more

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
YouTube
Instagram
DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
All Rights Reserved © 2023
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Forgot Password?
Lost your password? Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.