LAWYER SIBLING LOGO (1)
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • News
  • Updates
  • Constitution
    • Constitutional Laws
  • Laws
    • Civil Law
    • Criminal Law
    • Family Law
    • Real Estate Law
    • Business Law
    • Cyber & IT Law
    • Employee Law
    • Finance Law
    • International Law
  • Special Act
    • Motor Vehicles Act (MV Act)
    • Consumer Protection Act
    • Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Act (NDPS)
    • The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO)
  • Bare Act

Supreme Court Justice Ujjal Bhuyan voices concern over rising extra-Judicial killings, police violence

19/09/2026BlogNo Comments

Supreme Court Justice Ujjal Bhuyan has expressed serious concern over the reported rise in extra-judicial killings and instances of police violence, questioning whether investigative agencies are increasingly resorting to impermissible shortcuts in criminal investigations.

Speaking at a programme on criminal justice and constitutional jurisprudence, Justice Bhuyan reflected on the persistence of custodial violence and extra-judicial deaths, observing that such incidents could no longer be regarded merely as remnants of an earlier era.

The judge questioned the circumstances in which persons taken into police custody subsequently die during purported encounters or other police operations. He particularly raised questions over the practice of taking accused persons to alleged crime scenes during the early hours of the morning for the purpose of investigation or reconstruction.

Justice Bhuyan has previously voiced concern over custodial deaths and the manner in which police personnel exercise coercive authority. He has stressed that policing must remain anchored in constitutional values, accountability and respect for human dignity.

The judge has also expressed disquiet over allegations of police personnel personally using force against protesters, noting that the institutional detachment expected of law-enforcement officers must not be compromised.

The observations bring into focus the fundamental distinction between investigation and punishment. The determination of criminal culpability is entrusted to the judicial process, and the investigative machinery cannot substitute coercive or extra-legal action for proof to be established in accordance with law.

Justice Bhuyan’s remarks thus reiterate a foundational constitutional principle: the State’s legitimate interest in combating crime cannot operate as a licence to dilute safeguards afforded to individuals in custody. The credibility of the criminal justice system ultimately rests upon the ability of its institutions to enforce the law while remaining subject to the law themselves.

The post Supreme Court Justice Ujjal Bhuyan voices concern over rising extra-Judicial killings, police violence appeared first on India Legal.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • India’s BRICS Moment—and the World Beyond It
  • BRICS And The India Balance
  • The Child Who Clicked “I Agree”
  • Six Years, Still Waiting
  • Justice Abhay Oka urges BCI to act against lawyers discussing ongoing cases with media

Recent Comments

  1. Phone Tracking In India - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  2. Section 437A of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  3. The Evolution of Indian Penal Code 1860: Key Provisions and Relevance Today - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA

Follow us for more

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
YouTube
Instagram
DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
All Rights Reserved © 2023
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Forgot Password?
Lost your password? Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.