LAWYER SIBLING LOGO (1)
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • News
  • Updates
  • Constitution
    • Constitutional Laws
  • Laws
    • Civil Law
    • Criminal Law
    • Family Law
    • Real Estate Law
    • Business Law
    • Cyber & IT Law
    • Employee Law
    • Finance Law
    • International Law
  • Special Act
    • Motor Vehicles Act (MV Act)
    • Consumer Protection Act
    • Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Act (NDPS)
    • The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO)
  • Bare Act

Supreme Court to hear plea challenging quashing of rioting case against Punjab CM Bhagwant Mann

22/05/2026BlogNo Comments

The Chandigarh administration has approached the Supreme Court challenging a decision of the Punjab and Haryana High Court that quashed criminal proceedings against Punjab Chief Minister Bhagwant Mann and several leaders of the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) in a case relating to rioting and unlawful assembly.

The Bench of Chief Justice of India (CJI) Surya Kant, Justice Joymalya Bagchi and Justice Vipin Pancholi agreed to list the plea for hearing after Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, appearing on behalf of the Union Territory administration, apprised the Court that additional respondents would have to be impleaded in the matter since similar relief had earlier been granted to others connected with the same case

Acknowledging the request, the Court stated that the case would be listed once the application to add additional respondents is formally filed.

The FIR was registered by Chandigarh Police in 2020 after Mann and other AAP leaders organised a protest march against the increase in electricity tariff. The protesters had allegedly planned to surround the residence of the then Punjab Chief Minister but were stopped by the police using water cannons, following which stone pelting on police personnel was allegedly reported.

On November 29, 2025, Justice Tribhuvan Dahiya of the Punjab and Haryana High Court allowed petitions seeking the quashing of the FIR filed by Mann and other party leaders.

The High Court held that there was no justification for preventing the protest march since no prohibitory orders under Section 144 of the Code of Criminal Procedure had been imposed at the relevant time.

The Court further noted that none of the persons allegedly involved in stone pelting had been specifically identified and that there were no allegations that the petitioners had instigated such acts. It observed that no specific words, gestures, or overt acts had been attributed to the accused leaders.

Holding that there was no basis to connect the petitioners with the alleged violence, the High Court concluded that offences relating to rioting, assault on police personnel, and unlawful assembly were not made out in the facts of the case.

The post Supreme Court to hear plea challenging quashing of rioting case against Punjab CM Bhagwant Mann appeared first on India Legal.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • Madhya Pradesh High Court orders second autopsy by AIIMS doctors in Twisha Sharma death case
  • Delhi High Court appoints Senior Advocate Rajdipa Behura as amicus in contempt case against AAP leaders
  • Centre assures Supreme Court of bringing back deported Bangladeshi nationals for verification
  • Madras High Court rejects film ban, says some judges may be corrupt
  • NCERT judiciary chapter row: Supreme Court recalls order blacklisting academics

Recent Comments

  1. Phone Tracking In India - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  2. Section 437A of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  3. The Evolution of Indian Penal Code 1860: Key Provisions and Relevance Today - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA

Follow us for more

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
YouTube
Instagram
DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
All Rights Reserved © 2023
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Forgot Password?
Lost your password? Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.