LAWYER SIBLING LOGO (1)
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • News
  • Updates
  • Constitution
    • Constitutional Laws
  • Laws
    • Civil Law
    • Criminal Law
    • Family Law
    • Real Estate Law
    • Business Law
    • Cyber & IT Law
    • Employee Law
    • Finance Law
    • International Law
  • Special Act
    • Motor Vehicles Act (MV Act)
    • Consumer Protection Act
    • Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Act (NDPS)
    • The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO)
  • Bare Act

Technology alone cannot end stock witness practice: Justice Vivek Agarwal at Supreme Court panel consultation

07/09/2026BlogNo Comments

The Supreme Court-constituted Committee on reforms concerning the use of “stock witnesses” held its South Zone Consultation in Bengaluru on September 5 and 6, bringing together judges, prosecutors, police officials, lawyers and administrators to examine ways to curb the practice in criminal investigations.

At the valedictory session, Justice Vivek Agarwal of the Madhya Pradesh High Court, who chairs the Committee, said technological and administrative reforms alone could not eliminate the problem and stressed the need to address the deeper issue of public morality.

Justice Agarwal said a key takeaway from the two-day consultation was the need to encourage genuine and independent witnesses to participate in criminal proceedings. He called for measures to make court appearances easier, including greater use of electronic appearances, while reducing delays and repeated summons.

He also emphasised that witnesses should be treated with respect and that mechanical or repetitive summoning should be avoided. Greater transparency in the process of summoning witnesses was also required, he said.

Among the reforms discussed was the separation of investigation from law-and-order duties, which was highlighted as an important measure for improving investigative independence. Suggestions were also made for local mechanisms to identify repeatedly used witnesses and distinguish “stock witnesses” from witnesses who are genuinely present in multiple cases.

The consultation also examined proposals for digital witness repositories, digital police-station diaries, investigation management systems and greater use of technology to preserve and authenticate evidence. Participants suggested using tools such as e-Sakshya and the Crime and Criminal Tracking Network and Systems (CCTNS) to improve accountability and traceability.

Justice Agarwal also highlighted concerns over the fear faced by members of the public in becoming witnesses. He endorsed the suggestion that witnesses be treated as “guests of the court” and called for greater public awareness, beginning at the school level.

He further noted that police performance should not be judged solely by conviction rates, as such pressure could encourage improper investigation or the use of false witnesses.

Concluding the session, Justice Agarwal said stronger public morality, technology-driven reforms and more witness-friendly courts were essential to tackling the problem.

The consultation was attended by senior judicial, police, prosecutorial and legal officials from several southern States.

The post Technology alone cannot end stock witness practice: Justice Vivek Agarwal at Supreme Court panel consultation appeared first on India Legal.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • Centre clears appointment of three Judicial officers as Chhattisgarh High Court Judges
  • Supreme Court revives Environmental clearance for bio-medical waste facility, upholds 2016 CPCB guidelines
  • Delhi High Court directs DDA to verify Kaathputhli flats, expedite rehabilitation of 2,800 families
  • Supreme Court closes NCERT Textbook case, says Judicial criticism must be fair and informed
  • Gaurav Bhatia moves Delhi High Court with ₹2 Crore defamation suit against CJP leaders

Recent Comments

  1. Phone Tracking In India - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  2. Section 437A of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  3. The Evolution of Indian Penal Code 1860: Key Provisions and Relevance Today - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA

Follow us for more

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
YouTube
Instagram
DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
All Rights Reserved © 2023
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Forgot Password?
Lost your password? Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.