LAWYER SIBLING LOGO (1)
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • News
  • Updates
  • Constitution
    • Constitutional Laws
  • Laws
    • Civil Law
    • Criminal Law
    • Family Law
    • Real Estate Law
    • Business Law
    • Cyber & IT Law
    • Employee Law
    • Finance Law
    • International Law
  • Special Act
    • Motor Vehicles Act (MV Act)
    • Consumer Protection Act
    • Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Act (NDPS)
    • The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO)
  • Bare Act

NGT takes suo motu cognizance of illegal reconstruction at Ansals Aravali Retreat

31/08/2024BlogNo Comments

The National Green Tribunal (NGT) has taken Suo Motu cognizance of reconstruction activities at the Ansals Aravali Retreat in Raisina, Gurgaon merely two weeks after the district administration ordered demolition of illegal farmhouses in the area.   

The petition is registered suo motu on the basis of the news item dated 28.07.2024.

As per the article, Land here is classified as ‘gair mumkin pahar’ and is protected under the Punjab Land Preservation Act (PLPA) and the Aravali Notification of 1992, which prohibits construction and tree felling without mandatory permission from the authorities.  

Furthermore, this is a blatant violation of NGT’s order in 2013 (Sonya Ghosh V State of Haryana & ors) wherein the Tribunal directed Haryana and Rajasthan governments to set up a monitoring committee and conduct periodic reviews until all encroachments are cleared from the Aravalis in Gurgaon, Faridabad, Nuh and Alwar, restore forestland and submit action-taken reports. A detailed list of these structures was submitted to NGT. The report also had details of  the total area occupied by encroachers and their locations. Upon which the honorable tribunal vide its order dated 09.12.20222 directed that further remedial action may be taken by the States of Rajasthan and Haryana in accordance with law and the compliance may be monitored at the level of Chief Secretaries of the respective States. 

The news item highlights that the reconstruction activities do not just involve razed buildings being rebuilt but more protected land has been cleared, new roads have come up, and electricity poles are being erected. 

It states that several farmhouses which were demolished earlier have already been rebuilt, while the ones that were razed 15 days ago are being reconstructed. Moreover, many people are buying land in the area even though they know that govt has prohibited construction and demolished numerous illegal structures, including farmhouses and boundary walls, in the past. The article also alleges that some farmhouse owners are pasting court orders on the gates with intention to inform the district administration that their properties can’t be demolished as they have received court relief. There are, however, no court orders to that effect.

The news item states that as per forest department survey, at least 500 farmhouses have been built illegally on the Aravali land in Gurgaon. The Gurgaon administration in 2020 had replaced the term ‘gair mumkin pahar’ with ‘gair mumkin farmhouse’ which found its way into revenue records, and helped farmhouse owners skirt provisions of the Aravali Notification. 

It is highlighted that despite orders of NGT in Oct 2018 to remove encroachments and restore forests in the Aravalis, construction has only increased in Raisina due to delayed action of the district administration. 

The article explains that Raisina hills and Aravali Retreat act as a wildlife corridor between Sariska National Park and Asola Bhatti Wildlife Sanctuary, and are therefore in need of conservation and removal of illegal structures and activities.  

The news item raises substantial issue relating to compliance of the environmental norms, especially compliance of Forest Conservation Act, 1980 and the Environment Protection Act, 1986.  

“Power of the Tribunal to take up the matter in suo-motu exercise of power has been recognized by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the matter of “Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai vs. Ankita Sinha & Ors.” reported in 2021 SCC Online SC 897.”

Hence, the Principal Bench of Justice Prakash Shrivastava and Dr. A. Senthil Vel impleaded the following as respondents in the matter:

(1). Ministry of Environment and Forest.

(2). Chief Secretary. Haryana.

(3). Principal Chief Conservator of Forest, Haryana, Principal Chief Conservator of Forests (HoFF) Department of E&F, Govt. of Haryana.

(4). Haryana Space Application Center, through its Principal Secretary. 

(5). District Magistrate, Gurgaon.  

The Bench issued notice to the Respondents and listed the matter on 03.12.2024.

The post NGT takes suo motu cognizance of illegal reconstruction at Ansals Aravali Retreat appeared first on India Legal.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • India-Canada: Critical Partners Must Reset Diplomatic Ties
  • Lawless Ambitions, Judicial Setbacks, And A Billionaire Rebellion
  • The Politics of Sindoor
  • CJI BR Gavai terms arbitration as strong pillar showcasing transformation of justice delivery system
  • “One Rank, One Pension”: SC Ends Discrimination in Judges’ Benefits

Recent Comments

  1. Phone Tracking In India - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  2. Section 437A of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  3. The Evolution of Indian Penal Code 1860: Key Provisions and Relevance Today - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA

Follow us for more

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
YouTube
Instagram
DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
All Rights Reserved © 2023
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Forgot Password?
Lost your password? Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.