LAWYER SIBLING LOGO (1)
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • News
  • Updates
  • Constitution
    • Constitutional Laws
  • Laws
    • Civil Law
    • Criminal Law
    • Family Law
    • Real Estate Law
    • Business Law
    • Cyber & IT Law
    • Employee Law
    • Finance Law
    • International Law
  • Special Act
    • Motor Vehicles Act (MV Act)
    • Consumer Protection Act
    • Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Act (NDPS)
    • The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO)
  • Bare Act

Delhi High Court dismisses plea seeking establishment of board for protection of Sanatana Dharma

27/11/2024BlogNo Comments

The Delhi High Court on Wednesday refused to entertain a petition that seeks establishment of a board for the protection of Sanatana Dharma/Hindu religion, on the lines of the Waqf Board.

The Bench of Chief Justice Manmohan and Justice Tushar Rao Gedela said the Court could not interfere in the issue since it fell within the domain of policy matters.

However, the High Court granted liberty to the petitioner to approach the government for appropriate action.

Filed by the Sanatan Hindu Sewa Sangh Trust, the petition alleged that the followers of Sanatana Dharma were being attacked by the followers of other religions.

It said there was no religious body for the protection of rights and customs of the Sanatana Dharma.

The petitioner contended that it had earlier filed a representation before the government, which did not yield any response.

The post Delhi High Court dismisses plea seeking establishment of board for protection of Sanatana Dharma appeared first on India Legal.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • Allahabad High Court orders fresh ICC inquiry against professor, says delayed POSH complaints cannot be rejected mechanically
  • Delhi High Court reshuffle: Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma moved to civil petitions; Justice Manoj Jain to handle special MP/MLA roster
  • Karnataka High Court orders departmental inquiry against state police following arbitrary arrests
  • Delhi High Court directs Meesho to take down listing of products infringing Jockey trademark
  • Bombay High Court upholds rejection of RTE admission over failure to prove neighbourhood residence

Recent Comments

  1. Phone Tracking In India - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  2. Section 437A of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  3. The Evolution of Indian Penal Code 1860: Key Provisions and Relevance Today - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA

Follow us for more

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
YouTube
Instagram
DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
All Rights Reserved © 2023
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Forgot Password?
Lost your password? Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.