LAWYER SIBLING LOGO (1)
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • News
  • Updates
  • Constitution
    • Constitutional Laws
  • Laws
    • Civil Law
    • Criminal Law
    • Family Law
    • Real Estate Law
    • Business Law
    • Cyber & IT Law
    • Employee Law
    • Finance Law
    • International Law
  • Special Act
    • Motor Vehicles Act (MV Act)
    • Consumer Protection Act
    • Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Act (NDPS)
    • The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO)
  • Bare Act

Calcutta High Court stays coercive action against Parambrata Chatterjee in 2021 West Bengal post-poll violence case

29/05/2026BlogNo Comments

The Calcutta High Court on Friday directed that no coercive steps be taken against actor-director Parambrata Chatterjee in connection with an FIR registered over alleged provocative social media posts related to the 2021 post-poll violence in West Bengal.

The interim protection was granted by the single-judge Bench of Justice Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee while hearing a petition filed by Chatterjee seeking quashing of the criminal proceedings and protection from arrest.

The FIR was registered at Gariahat Police Station on the basis of a complaint alleging that certain social media posts made by Chatterjee and actor Swastika Mukherjee had contributed to or instigated violence following the 2021 West Bengal Assembly elections. The complaint invoked provisions of the Indian Penal Code relating to abetment and promotion of enmity between different groups, including Section 153A IPC, which is a non-bailable offence.

During the hearing, counsel appearing for Chatterjee argued that the FIR did not disclose any specific overt act, unlawful conduct or material showing involvement of the petitioner in any conspiracy or incitement to violence. It was further submitted that the FIR had been lodged nearly five years after the alleged social media post, rendering the prosecution legally unsustainable and an abuse of the criminal process.

The petitioner also contended that the allegations were based on a single social media post made in May 2021 and argued that the ingredients necessary to constitute offences under Sections 109 and 153A IPC were absent. Reliance was placed on judicial precedents relating to protection of free speech and the requirement of establishing intention to promote enmity or public disorder in offences involving online expression.

After hearing the submissions, the High Court observed that the petitioner had made out an arguable case requiring consideration on merits. The Court permitted the investigation to continue but directed that no coercive action be taken against Chatterjee for a period of four weeks or until further orders, whichever was earlier, subject to his cooperation with the investigating agency.

The Court further clarified that the interim protection would not prevent the investigating agency from completing the investigation or filing a final report in accordance with law.

The controversy arises from social media activity allegedly linked to the politically sensitive aftermath of the 2021 West Bengal Assembly elections, during which multiple incidents of post-poll violence had been reported across the State.

The post Calcutta High Court stays coercive action against Parambrata Chatterjee in 2021 West Bengal post-poll violence case appeared first on India Legal.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • Delhi High Court dismisses Chitra Ramkrishna plea against PC Act in NSE co-location scam case
  • Supreme Court stays criminal proceedings against Hindu man in Madhya Pradesh forced conversion case
  • Delhi High Court designates 85 lawyers as Senior Advocates
  • Centre opposes mandatory disclosure of nicotine, tar content on cigarette packs over risk of misleading consumers
  • Delhi High Court disposes of pleas challenging Show Jumping Team selection after India opts out of Asian Games 2026

Recent Comments

  1. Phone Tracking In India - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  2. Section 437A of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  3. The Evolution of Indian Penal Code 1860: Key Provisions and Relevance Today - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA

Follow us for more

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
YouTube
Instagram
DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
All Rights Reserved © 2023
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Forgot Password?
Lost your password? Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.