LAWYER SIBLING LOGO (1)
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • News
  • Updates
  • Constitution
    • Constitutional Laws
  • Laws
    • Civil Law
    • Criminal Law
    • Family Law
    • Real Estate Law
    • Business Law
    • Cyber & IT Law
    • Employee Law
    • Finance Law
    • International Law
  • Special Act
    • Motor Vehicles Act (MV Act)
    • Consumer Protection Act
    • Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Act (NDPS)
    • The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO)
  • Bare Act

Chhattisgarh High Court takes suo motu cognizance of theft of minerals from army land

02/01/2025BlogNo Comments

The Chhattisgarh High Court has taken suo motu cognizance of a news article alleging theft of muroom (mixture of minerals, organic matters, gravels, rock particles etc) from army land and its use in illegal construction activities. 

The news report, published on December 24, 2024, highlighted that a private builder was using stolen muroom to construct roads in its colony.

The Division Bench of Chief Justice Ramesh Sinha and Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal considered the matter serious, as it involved the theft of property belonging to the army. 

The news report alleged that the stolen muroom was being used to construct a colony near Parsada, Raipur road. 

The court directed the Registry to implead  private builder as respondent No. 10 in the present public interest litigation.

The Additional Advocate General, appearing for the state, produced a copy of the letter sent by the Mining Officer, District Bilaspur, to the private builder, directing him to stop using the stolen muroom. 

The court directed the respondent No. 1, Union of India, and respondent No. 3, Secretary Mines and Mineral Department, to file their respective personal affidavits in this regard.

The matter has been listed for further hearing on January 9, 2025.

The post Chhattisgarh High Court takes suo motu cognizance of theft of minerals from army land appeared first on India Legal.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • Gyanvapi, Mathura and Sambhal litigants reject Supreme Court’s mediation proposal
  • CJI Surya Kant constitutes Special Benches for exclusive hearing of oldest pending cases in Supreme Court
  • Justice should not be denied due to economic or procedural hurdles, says CJI Surya Kant at inauguration of Tower of Justice in Gurugram
  • US judge seeks Gautam Adani response on possible Quid Pro Quo behind DOJ’s bid to drop criminal case
  • Sikkim High Court upholds conviction of 42-year-old for abetting minor’s suicide

Recent Comments

  1. Phone Tracking In India - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  2. Section 437A of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  3. The Evolution of Indian Penal Code 1860: Key Provisions and Relevance Today - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA

Follow us for more

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
YouTube
Instagram
DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
All Rights Reserved © 2023
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Forgot Password?
Lost your password? Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.