The Delhi High Court has dismissed two Public Interest Litigations (PILs) that sought restrictions on the release of the upcoming film The Taj Story. The petitions had demanded that the movie carry a disclaimer clarifying it was not based on historical facts.
A bench comprising Chief Justice Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya and Justice Tushar Rao Gedela observed that courts are not the appropriate forum to adjudicate historical interpretations. “Even among historians, differing opinions exist. Which version should we accept?” the judges remarked, emphasising that the judiciary cannot act as a “super censor board.”
The petitioners argued that the film portrayed a distorted and provocative version of history, suggesting inaccuracies about the Taj Mahal’s origins. They urged the court to direct the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) to either modify the film’s certification or add a disclaimer.
However, the court noted that the petitioners had not first approached the Central Government, as required under Section 6 of the Cinematograph Act, 1952. The bench also remarked that actor Paresh Rawal, who stars in the film, should not have been made a party to the case.
The court has allowed the petitioners to withdraw their pleas and advised them to raise their concerns with the Central Government instead.
The post Delhi High Court declines to intervene in PILs against The Taj Story appeared first on India Legal.