LAWYER SIBLING LOGO (1)
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • News
  • Updates
  • Constitution
    • Constitutional Laws
  • Laws
    • Civil Law
    • Criminal Law
    • Family Law
    • Real Estate Law
    • Business Law
    • Cyber & IT Law
    • Employee Law
    • Finance Law
    • International Law
  • Special Act
    • Motor Vehicles Act (MV Act)
    • Consumer Protection Act
    • Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Act (NDPS)
    • The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO)
  • Bare Act

Gujarat High Court reminds IIT student of courtroom decorum

28/04/2026BlogNo Comments

The Gujarat High Court on Monday raised concerns over the attire of a student from Indian Institute of Technology (IIT), Gandhinagar who appeared before the court in connection with her case.

Justice Nirzar S Desai observed that while individuals are free to choose how they dress, such choices must align with the decorum expected in a courtroom. He emphasised that personal liberty in matters of attire cannot be viewed independently of the setting in which it is exercised.The judge noted that courts function on principles of discipline and decorum, likening them to institutions with established norms and traditions. He remarked that appropriate attire forms part of the conduct expected within judicial spaces.

These observations were made during the hearing of a petition filed by the student challenging disciplinary action taken against her by IIT Gandhinagar, including her removal from the hostel and other sanctions.

Appearing for the petitioner, Senior Advocate Percy Kavina argued that the student’s attire had no bearing on the case and should not influence the Court’s decision. While Justice Desai acknowledged that clothing does not determine judicial outcomes, he maintained that behaviour and discipline must be assessed in the context of the environment in which they occur.

As arguments advanced, the judge also advised restraint in advocacy, reminding counsel of the importance of humility while representing a student’s cause.Following the exchange, senior advocate requested the petitioner to step out of the courtroom while arguments continued.

On merits, the petitioner contended that the disciplinary proceedings arose from multiple disputes, including a reduction in her research grant and allegations linked to her presence in a male student’s hostel room during his absence. It was argued that the inquiry was procedurally flawed, rushed, and disproportionate, and that continued punishment would amount to excessive penalisation, especially as her academic term was nearing completion.

During the hearing, the Court also took note of certain admitted facts, including the student’s access to the key of the room in question. Justice Desai observed that conduct may be perceived differently depending on institutional norms, adding that individuals must acknowledge mistakes and respond with accountability rather than confrontation.

While stressing that he did not wish to adversely impact any student’s future, the judge underscored that unacceptable conduct cannot be condoned.The Court ultimately issued notice to the institute’s Director but declined to grant interim relief at this stage.The matter is scheduled to be heard next on April 29.

The post Gujarat High Court reminds IIT student of courtroom decorum appeared first on India Legal.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • Karur stampede: Madras High Court tells Tamil Nadu CM to provide compassionate jobs on temporary basis
  • Supreme Court to hear plea seeking CBI probe in Ram Mandir donation theft
  • Allahabad High Court declines PILs seeking Judicial Commission, SIT probe into Ayodhya Ram Mandir donations
  • Delhi High Court dismisses Chitra Ramkrishna plea against PC Act in NSE co-location scam case
  • Supreme Court stays criminal proceedings against Hindu man in Madhya Pradesh forced conversion case

Recent Comments

  1. Phone Tracking In India - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  2. Section 437A of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  3. The Evolution of Indian Penal Code 1860: Key Provisions and Relevance Today - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA

Follow us for more

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
YouTube
Instagram
DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
All Rights Reserved © 2023
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Forgot Password?
Lost your password? Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.