LAWYER SIBLING LOGO (1)
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • News
  • Updates
  • Constitution
    • Constitutional Laws
  • Laws
    • Civil Law
    • Criminal Law
    • Family Law
    • Real Estate Law
    • Business Law
    • Cyber & IT Law
    • Employee Law
    • Finance Law
    • International Law
  • Special Act
    • Motor Vehicles Act (MV Act)
    • Consumer Protection Act
    • Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Act (NDPS)
    • The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO)
  • Bare Act

Malegaon blast victims families challenge acquittal of Pragya Thakur and others in Bombay High Court

10/09/2025BlogNo Comments

Families of six victims of the 2008 Malegaon bomb blast have approached the Bombay High Court, challenging the recent acquittal of seven accused, including BJP MP Pragya Singh Thakur and Lt. Col. Prasad Purohit. The appeal comes in response to the verdict delivered on July 31, 2025, by a special National Investigation Agency (NIA) court, which held that the prosecution had failed to present convincing evidence and extended the benefit of doubt to the accused.

The blast, which struck a predominantly Muslim locality in Malegaon’s Nashik district on September 29, 2008, involved an improvised explosive device hidden in a motorcycle. The explosion killed six people and left over a hundred injured. The victims’ relatives, represented by advocate Mateen Shaikh, contend that the trial court’s reasoning is deeply flawed and that its judgment essentially reduced the court to functioning as a post-office for the prosecution, overlooking vital material.

The plea argues that minor procedural lapses—inevitable given the passage of time—were wrongly used to discard critical evidence. It stresses that terrorism cases often involve covert conspiracies that rarely leave direct evidence, requiring courts to adopt a nuanced approach. By disregarding this, the trial court, the appellants say, has compromised justice.

The Malegaon case was first investigated by the Maharashtra ATS, which filed its chargesheet in 2009, before being taken over by the NIA in 2010. In 2016, the NIA filed a supplementary chargesheet, dropping the stringent MCOCA charges but continuing the case under the IPC, UAPA, and the Explosive Substances Act. The trial commenced in 2018 and concluded in April 2025.

The High Court is expected to hear the matter before a bench of Justices Ajay Gadkari and Ranjitsinha Bhosale, likely in mid-September 2025. The outcome could have wide repercussions, both for the victims’ families seeking accountability and for the political and legal landscape surrounding one of India’s most controversial terror cases.

The post Malegaon blast victims families challenge acquittal of Pragya Thakur and others in Bombay High Court appeared first on India Legal.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • US judge seeks Gautam Adani response on possible Quid Pro Quo behind DOJ’s bid to drop criminal case
  • Sikkim High Court upholds conviction of 42-year-old for abetting minor’s suicide
  • CJI Surya Kant calls for complete overhaul of alternative dispute resolution framework in India
  • Tamil Nadu polls: Madras High Court restrains ECI from notifying bypolls amid pending election petitions
  • Delhi High Court flags trend of sexual offence allegations in matrimonial disputes to secure settlements

Recent Comments

  1. Phone Tracking In India - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  2. Section 437A of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  3. The Evolution of Indian Penal Code 1860: Key Provisions and Relevance Today - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA

Follow us for more

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
YouTube
Instagram
DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
All Rights Reserved © 2023
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Forgot Password?
Lost your password? Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.