LAWYER SIBLING LOGO (1)
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • News
  • Updates
  • Constitution
    • Constitutional Laws
  • Laws
    • Civil Law
    • Criminal Law
    • Family Law
    • Real Estate Law
    • Business Law
    • Cyber & IT Law
    • Employee Law
    • Finance Law
    • International Law
  • Special Act
    • Motor Vehicles Act (MV Act)
    • Consumer Protection Act
    • Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Act (NDPS)
    • The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO)
  • Bare Act

Supreme Court refuses immediate intervention in petition over social media use of court remarks

25/05/2026BlogNo Comments

The Supreme Court has declined to accord urgent listing to a petition seeking a Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) inquiry into the activities allegedly associated with the online movement popularly referred to as the “Cockroach Janta Party.”

The matter was mentioned before a Bench headed by Chief Justice of India Surya Kant along with Justices Joymalya Bagchi and Vipul M. Pancholi. Counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that certain individuals were allegedly exploiting courtroom proceedings and judicial observations through social media campaigns that, according to the plea, undermined the dignity and credibility of the judiciary.

While considering the request for urgent hearing, the Chief Justice orally remarked, “Don’t take it sentimentally,” indicating that the issue did not warrant immediate judicial intervention. The Bench observed that no exceptional urgency had been demonstrated to justify out-of-turn listing of the matter.

During the proceedings, another counsel supporting the plea contended that the petition also raised serious concerns regarding alleged fake advocates, forged law degrees, and monetisation of selectively circulated courtroom remarks on digital platforms. It was argued that such activities had the potential to erode public confidence in the justice delivery system.

The Court, however, was not inclined to entertain the request for urgent hearing and stated that the matter would be considered in accordance with the regular listing procedure.

The petition reportedly seeks a CBI probe into the alleged misuse and commercial exploitation of oral judicial observations, claiming that portions of courtroom exchanges were being selectively edited, sensationalised, and circulated online for publicity and financial gain.

The controversy appears to have arisen after certain oral remarks made during previous Supreme Court proceedings gained widespread traction on social media, eventually leading to the emergence of satirical online content and commentary under the banner of the so-called “Cockroach Janta Party.”

The post Supreme Court refuses immediate intervention in petition over social media use of court remarks appeared first on India Legal.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • Delhi High Court gives Centre time to respond to Siddharth Varadarajan’s affidavit on bail disclosure
  • NEET-UG 2026 controversy: Supreme Court calls for accountability from NTA and monitoring committee
  • Delhi High Court criticises lawyers strike against enhancement of District courts pecuniary jurisdiction
  • Supreme Court refuses immediate intervention in petition over social media use of court remarks
  • Twisha Sharma death case: Supreme Court says CBI to take over probe, urges media restraint

Recent Comments

  1. Phone Tracking In India - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  2. Section 437A of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  3. The Evolution of Indian Penal Code 1860: Key Provisions and Relevance Today - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA

Follow us for more

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
YouTube
Instagram
DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
All Rights Reserved © 2023
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Forgot Password?
Lost your password? Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.